Class Report #1 - 1/25/18

Eviction Day

1.0   The Inside of the Edward W. Brooke Courthouse

First Take

First walking into the courthouse is a overwhelming experience in and of itself never mind the 
fact that peoples’ lives are being changed within its core. 

You are first met by a wall of security and metal detectors forcing you to practically undress if you 
don’t have the privilege of a Lawyer’s license allowing you to pass no questions asked. 

Walking further into the building, we were met with a grand atrium space that reminds you how 
small you are within the confines of such a monumental establishment. The building itself gives off 
an air of monumentality with large columns covered in white granite and granite staircases.




Tour

We were led on a tour through the whole courthouse to see the operations of the different parts of the 
courthouse including several different courtrooms, some transaction floors and office space.

When walking through the space, you will start to notice the presence of many security guards, many 
lawyers moving through crowds of people awaiting their hearings and the energetic static of private 
conversations between lawyers and their clients.

The sheer size of the building is enormous and once you begin to navigates its halls, only then do you
realize that there’s a whole other series of hallways and doors that only judges and other court 
personnel get to move around in. While moving through the space, you end up passing numerous 
courtrooms providing confusion to the public using the building.

There are few ways for a person of the public especially a new-comer to the courthouse to navigate 
their way through the building; if they have al their papers in order and have a clue to their hearing 
number and information, they’re in good shape but make up the minority, the majority of people that 
navigate the courthouse struggle to use the unmanned information desk with a slow moving display 
of all the court cases for a single given day or try to wander through the courthouse looking for their 
case.


Uses

The Brooke courthouse is home to several different entities of the legal system in Boston including a 
branch of the Boston Municipal Court (BMC), housing court, juvenile court, and probate/family 
services. 

The hustle and bustle of the halls of the courthouse elevates throughout the morning generally 
stemming from the section where the Lawyer of the Day program is set up to help patrons of the 
court who cannot afford a lawyer to get some advice from legal professionals.


There is also a section of the courthouse, specifically for the housing court for mediation services 
where many housing disputes result in agreements between the landlord and renter without reaching 
the actual courtroom.


2.0   Housing Court

The courtroom

The courtroom is laid out to be a threshold between the public and the judge/magistrate/clerk; there is a literal bar that separates the room in two parts, the seating for the public and the legal portion where you plead your case to the judge.

The courtroom that we had the privilege of sitting in to watch some of the trials occurring that day had a simple plan allowing natural light to flood the room through large bay windows, the double height courtroom had about 30-40 people packed into the rear where the seating section was designated.

3.0   The Hearings

We were able to meet and speak with Chief Justice of the Housing Court, Tim Sullivan; we asked him questions about his day to day schedule, what kind of cases he deals with etc.

We had the opportunity to sit in on a few hearings conducted by the Chief Justice of the Boston Housing Courts which ranged from no-shows on the defendants’ part to full hearings about how long renters had to move out under their eviction notice.


One example of a case we witnessed occurred due to a behind payments on a property which resulted in an eviction being filed for the renter to vacate the premises. The defendant explained his situation to gain some sympathy from the court and pleaded his need for a longer period in which to find a new place to relocate to. The chief justice tried throughout to remain sympathetic to the defendant who often were dealing with less than ideal circumstances and typically ruled in favor of giving the defendant more time to deal with finding a new home or to come up with back-rent.

Take Away

Edward W. Brooke Courthouse provided a lens through which we could view the subject of housing court from a first-person point of view. The issues that were clearly outlined by our trip to Brooke Courthouse include lack of staffing, lack of accessible information to the public, and lack in wayfinding throughout the building. “Evicted” by Michael Desmond provided a large scope of background behind the lives of people who deal with the eviction and judicial system, but we didn’t get much insight about the proceedings of court internally. By being able to see the process first-hand gave me clarity about the eviction process; the general realization of the landlords that we saw in court were typically in partial sympathy to their tenant but have their business to build and maintain. I look forward to dealing with these issues first hand in our proposals to renovate the existing conditions at the Brooke Courthouse.